Mohammed Harshad vs Mahammed Suhail — 56/2025
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/Sec.166. Status: EVIDENCE - Civil. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKD020002282025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2025
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
15-04-2025
Registration No
56/2025
Registration Date
21-04-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI
Judge
364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammed Harshad
Adv. Giri A G
Respondent(s)
Mahammed Suhail
Nabeesa M M
ICICI Lombard
Hearing History
Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 20-12-2025 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 56/2025 Date: 13.02.2026 Court: Senior Civil Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff filed a false/fabricated case with the intention of obtaining compensation. The court determined that the plaintiff's testimony and evidence were inconsistent and contradictory, and that the accident circumstances presented were not credible. The defendants (parties 1 and 2) are held not liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 56/2025 Date: 13.02.2026 Court: Senior Civil Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff filed a false/fabricated case with the intention of obtaining compensation. The court determined that the plaintiff's testimony and evidence were inconsistent and contradictory, and that the accident circumstances presented were not credible. The defendants (parties 1 and 2) are held not liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts