Chinnamma B T vs India Garage Advocate - Somanna B M — 32/2025
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKD020001312025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2025
Filing Number
3/2025
Filing Date
21-02-2025
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
01-03-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI
Judge
364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chinnamma B T
B T Dechamma
Ponnamma B T
Ballaranda Bollavva
Respondent(s)
India Garage Advocate - Somanna B M
National Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 32/2025 | Date: 06.03.2026 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Kodagu, Mudikheri Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The insurance company's plea to reject the petitioner's claim for compensation in connection with a motor vehicle accident has been denied. The court found that the insured vehicle's driver was negligent, and the accident was caused by the pedestrian's lack of caution while crossing the road, making the insurance company liable to provide compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 32/2025 | Date: 06.03.2026 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Kodagu, Mudikheri Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The insurance company's plea to reject the petitioner's claim for compensation in connection with a motor vehicle accident has been denied. The court found that the insured vehicle's driver was negligent, and the accident was caused by the pedestrian's lack of caution while crossing the road, making the insurance company liable to provide compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts