Chinnamma B T vs India Garage Advocate - Somanna B M — 32/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKD020001312025

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2025

Filing Number

3/2025

Filing Date

21-02-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

01-03-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI

Judge

364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Chinnamma B T

B T Dechamma

Ponnamma B T

Ballaranda Bollavva

Respondent(s)

India Garage Advocate - Somanna B M

National Insurance Company Limited

Hearing History

Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

Interim Orders

29-08-2025
Issue
31-10-2025
Deposition
28-11-2025
Deposition
09-01-2026
Deposition
06-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 32/2025 | Date: 06.03.2026 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Kodagu, Mudikheri Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The insurance company's plea to reject the petitioner's claim for compensation in connection with a motor vehicle accident has been denied. The court found that the insured vehicle's driver was negligent, and the accident was caused by the pedestrian's lack of caution while crossing the road, making the insurance company liable to provide compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 32/2025 | Date: 06.03.2026 | Court: Senior Civil Judge, Kodagu, Mudikheri Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The insurance company's plea to reject the petitioner's claim for compensation in connection with a motor vehicle accident has been denied. The court found that the insured vehicle's driver was negligent, and the accident was caused by the pedestrian's lack of caution while crossing the road, making the insurance company liable to provide compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case