Dhore Swamy G vs Ubedulla N B — 17/2022
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKD020000762022
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
17/2022
Filing Date
05-02-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
05-02-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI
Judge
364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhore Swamy G
Adv. Joseph Vinil Kumar N.K.
Respondent(s)
Ubedulla N B
Musthafa N
United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS Civil
ARGUMENTS Civil
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
COMMISSION REPORT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 20-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | COMMISSION REPORT |
Interim Orders
This Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order from Madikeri (M.V.C. No. 17/2022) has framed four key issues for adjudication on July 4, 2022. The case involves petitioner Dhore Swamy G. claiming compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident on August 26, 2017, allegedly caused by the negligent driving of a lorry (Reg. No. KA-21-B-3856) by respondent Ubedulla N.B. The tribunal will determine whether the petitioner proved the accident was due to the respondent's negligence, whether respondents proved the petitioner's negligence caused the accident, and if so, the appropriate compensation amount and liable party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order from Madikeri (M.V.C. No. 17/2022) has framed four key issues for adjudication on July 4, 2022. The case involves petitioner Dhore Swamy G. claiming compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident on August 26, 2017, allegedly caused by the negligent driving of a lorry (Reg. No. KA-21-B-3856) by respondent Ubedulla N.B. The tribunal will determine whether the petitioner proved the accident was due to the respondent's negligence, whether respondents proved the petitioner's negligence caused the accident, and if so, the appropriate compensation amount and liable party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts