D D RAMESH vs D S DEVA SHETTY Advocate - Vasudev N.G. — 9/1999
Case under The Code of Civil Procedure Section 20 Rule 18. Status: AMENDMENT. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAKD020000051999
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
9/1999
Filing Date
15-04-1999
Registration No
9/1999
Registration Date
15-04-1999
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI
Judge
364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D D RAMESH
Adv. M.R.H.
Respondent(s)
D S DEVA SHETTY Advocate - Vasudev N.G.
SHAILAJA
VANAJA
VIJAYA PRASANNA
SURESH
DR. S.K VISHWESHWARA
ASHOK PLANTATIONSP LTD
D D KESHAVA
D D GANESH
PARVATHI
K N APPAJI
THANGAMMA APPAJI
N S LEELAVATHI
K S SARASWATHI
PADMAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
AMENDMENT
AMENDMENT
HEARING Civil
HEARING Civil
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | AMENDMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | AMENDMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING Civil |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING Civil |
| 04-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Outcome: Both Final Decree Petitions (FDP Nos. 8/1999 and 9/1999) were decreed. The court allotted partitioned properties to four shares: Serial No. 1 to respondent No.15 (purchaser in defendant No.1's share), Serial No. 2 to D.D.Keshava, Serial No. 3 to D.D.Ganesh, and Serial No. 4 to D.D.Ramesh, based on a court commissioner's partition report. Parties retain liberty to file separate petitions regarding two undivided blocks in Madikeri town that couldn't be physically partitioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Outcome: Both Final Decree Petitions (FDP Nos. 8/1999 and 9/1999) were decreed. The court allotted partitioned properties to four shares: Serial No. 1 to respondent No.15 (purchaser in defendant No.1's share), Serial No. 2 to D.D.Keshava, Serial No. 3 to D.D.Ganesh, and Serial No. 4 to D.D.Ramesh, based on a court commissioner's partition report. Parties retain liberty to file separate petitions regarding two undivided blocks in Madikeri town that couldn't be physically partitioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts