Abdul Rasheed B vs The State by Authorized officer and Deputy conservator of Forest Madikeri Division. — 137/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: Hearing Criminal. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAKD010015982025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
136/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
137/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
997-I Addl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abdul Rasheed B
Adv. Rajesh D K
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State by Authorized officer and Deputy conservator of Forest Madikeri Division.
Case History
-
23-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing Criminal
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 137/2025 before the 1st Additional District and Sessions Court, Madikeri-Kodagu, the court dismissed the appeal. The appellant delayed filing the appeal by 463 days despite having sufficient time, and the witness was not properly notified of the proceedings; the court found no grounds to condone the delay and rejected the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
Orders.
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
28-Jan-2026
Objection Criminal
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
14-Jan-2026
Enquiery
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
31-Dec-2025
Enquiery
I Addl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
20-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 137/2025
Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 137/2025 before the 1st Additional District and Sessions Court, Madikeri-Kodagu, the court dismissed the appeal. The appellant delayed filing the appeal by 463 days despite having sufficient time, and the witness was not properly notified of the proceedings; the court found no grounds to condone the delay and rejected the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts