M V Punith vs B N Praveen Kumar Advocate - Pundarika P — 118/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS
CNR: KAKD010014672025
Filing Number
118/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
118/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M V Punith
Adv. Sheethal M S
Respondent(s)
B N Praveen Kumar Advocate - Pundarika P
Hearing History
Judge: 363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ARGUMENTS Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Kodagu dismissed the accused's criminal revision petition seeking to refer a cheque to a handwriting expert for signature verification. The court held that since the accused had admitted issuing the cheque and his signature on it in his reply notice, he cannot later contest the signature's authenticity by claiming forgery; therefore, expert examination was unnecessary. The revision petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Kodagu dismissed the accused's criminal revision petition seeking to refer a cheque to a handwriting expert for signature verification. The court held that since the accused had admitted issuing the cheque and his signature on it in his reply notice, he cannot later contest the signature's authenticity by claiming forgery; therefore, expert examination was unnecessary. The revision petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts