M V Punith vs B N Praveen Kumar Advocate - Pundarika P — 118/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS
CNR: KAKD010014672025
Filing Number
118/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
118/2025
Registration Date
18-Nov-2025
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
363-Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M V Punith
Adv. Sheethal M S
Respondent(s)
-
1.B N Praveen Kumar Advocate - Pundarika P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Kodagu dismissed the accused's criminal revision petition seeking to refer a cheque to a handwriting expert for signature verification. The court held that since the accused had admitted issuing the cheque and his signature on it in his reply notice, he cannot later contest the signature's authenticity by claiming forgery; therefore, expert examination was unnecessary. The revision petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
03-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
18-Dec-2025
Arguments Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
02-Dec-2025
Arguments Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
18-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2025
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Kodagu dismissed the accused's criminal revision petition seeking to refer a cheque to a handwriting expert for signature verification. The court held that since the accused had admitted issuing the cheque and his signature on it in his reply notice, he cannot later contest the signature's authenticity by claiming forgery; therefore, expert examination was unnecessary. The revision petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts