T. K. Ramaiah vs Hyder Ali Advocate - Aiyappa N G — 112/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKD010012312023
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
112/2023
Filing Date
27-10-2023
Registration No
112/2023
Registration Date
30-10-2023
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
997-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. K. Ramaiah
Adv. Ravi Shankar G. R.
Respondent(s)
Hyder Ali Advocate - Aiyappa N G
K A Belliappa
Adv. Aiyappa N G
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Adv. Kaveendra C. M.
The Branch Manager, The Oriental Co. Ltd., Madikeri
Adv. Mohan Kumar M E
Hearing History
Judge: 997-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS Civil
ARGUMENTS Civil
ARGUMENTS Civil
ARGUMENTS Civil
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 07-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 27-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 12-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
Interim Orders
In case MVC 112/2023, the court adjourned the main hearing and recalled PW-1 (witness) for re-examination on 24-04-2025. Four hospital documents (inpatient final bill, advance receipts, and bill of supply) were marked as exhibits NIP-20 to NIP-23. The respondent's counsel challenged the authenticity of these documents and the witness's testimony, alleging fabrication. Counsels for defendants 1, 2, and 4 were marked absent without representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In case MVC 112/2023, the court adjourned the main hearing and recalled PW-1 (witness) for re-examination on 24-04-2025. Four hospital documents (inpatient final bill, advance receipts, and bill of supply) were marked as exhibits NIP-20 to NIP-23. The respondent's counsel challenged the authenticity of these documents and the witness's testimony, alleging fabrication. Counsels for defendants 1, 2, and 4 were marked absent without representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts