The State vs A.M Ganapathy Advocate - Kapil Kumar B.D — 59/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,504. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAKD010008322020
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
Filing Number
59/2020
Filing Date
03-11-2020
Registration No
59/2020
Registration Date
03-11-2020
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State
Adv. PP Madikeri
Respondent(s)
A.M Ganapathy Advocate - Kapil Kumar B.D
Hearing History
Judge: 363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
Interim Orders
This is a court order from the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kodagu-Madikeri (SC No. 59/2020) in Kannada language documenting witness examination (PW-6) in a criminal case. The witness Darshan K.R., a 26-year-old resort worker, was examined on 09-03-2026 regarding an incident from 12.11.2019. The order records the prosecution's examination of the witness and the defence counsel's cross-examination challenging the witness's identification of documents and statements. No specific final order (bail, conviction, dismissal, etc.) is pronounced in this document—it merely records the examination proceedings as part of the ongoing trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a court order from the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kodagu-Madikeri (SC No. 59/2020) in Kannada language documenting witness examination (PW-6) in a criminal case. The witness Darshan K.R., a 26-year-old resort worker, was examined on 09-03-2026 regarding an incident from 12.11.2019. The order records the prosecution's examination of the witness and the defence counsel's cross-examination challenging the witness's identification of documents and statements. No specific final order (bail, conviction, dismissal, etc.) is pronounced in this document—it merely records the examination proceedings as part of the ongoing trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts