Sneha R vs Divya Purushotham — 11/2025
Case under The Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Order,VII,Rule,1,and,2,R/w,Sec.26,of,CPC. Status: LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
COMM.O.S - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KAKD010005302025
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
e-Filing Number
02-04-2025
Filing Number
11/2025
Filing Date
07-04-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
997-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sneha R
Adv. Rachana P Pise
Respondent(s)
Divya Purushotham
Hearing History
Judge: 997-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS
LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS |
| 26-02-2026 | ISSUES |
| 20-02-2026 | ISSUES |
| 17-02-2026 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Commercial Court in Kodagu granted three applications filed by the plaintiff in a suit seeking specific performance of a memorandum of understanding regarding a resort property. I.A.No.III was allowed, exempting the plaintiff from the mandatory pre-institution mediation process due to urgent interim relief requirements and risk of property alienation. I.A.No.I was allowed, issuing a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from selling, mortgaging, or encumbering the scheduled property until the next hearing date. The plaintiff must comply with CPC provisions and the matter is returnable by June 30, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Commercial Court in Kodagu granted three applications filed by the plaintiff in a suit seeking specific performance of a memorandum of understanding regarding a resort property. I.A.No.III was allowed, exempting the plaintiff from the mandatory pre-institution mediation process due to urgent interim relief requirements and risk of property alienation. I.A.No.I was allowed, issuing a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from selling, mortgaging, or encumbering the scheduled property until the next hearing date. The plaintiff must comply with CPC provisions and the matter is returnable by June 30, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts