THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, Bhagamandala Police Station, Madikeri vs Uthappa A P Advocate - Chingappa O.S — 41/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506,302,201. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAKD010005012024
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
05-04-2024
Filing Number
41/2024
Filing Date
05-04-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
05-04-2024
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, Bhagamandala Police Station, Madikeri
Adv. P.P.
Respondent(s)
Uthappa A P Advocate - Chingappa O.S
Hearing History
Judge: 363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 04-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 14-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness examination record (SC No. 41/2024) from the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kodagu-Madikeri. Dr. Priydarshini M, an Associate Professor at KOIMS Madikeri, testified as PW-18 regarding blood group testing (A+ve) she conducted on the accused on 28.11.2023 at police request. The witness's testimony and evidence (marked as NIFI-28) were recorded and cross-examined by the accused's counsel; no further re-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness examination record (SC No. 41/2024) from the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kodagu-Madikeri. Dr. Priydarshini M, an Associate Professor at KOIMS Madikeri, testified as PW-18 regarding blood group testing (A+ve) she conducted on the accused on 28.11.2023 at police request. The witness's testimony and evidence (marked as NIFI-28) were recorded and cross-examined by the accused's counsel; no further re-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts