Jagadeesha B.D vs The Excise Inspector, Department of Excise, Somwarpet Sub-Division Advocate - Public Procecutor — 86/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKD010002322026
Filing Number
86/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
86/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
363-Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jagadeesha B.D
Adv. D.Lingappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Excise Inspector, Department of Excise, Somwarpet Sub-Division Advocate - Public Procecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted anticipatory bail to Sri Jagadeesha B.D., a 69-year-old agriculturist accused of illegal liquor preparation and storage under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. The court found that while the offences were non-bailable and serious, the petitioner's deep community roots, family responsibilities, and willingness to comply with conditions justified bail, subject to a personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with a surety and conditions including surrender within 15 days, non-tampering with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
06-Mar-2026
Objection Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 86/2026
Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted anticipatory bail to Sri Jagadeesha B.D., a 69-year-old agriculturist accused of illegal liquor preparation and storage under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. The court found that while the offences were non-bailable and serious, the petitioner's deep community roots, family responsibilities, and willingness to comply with conditions justified bail, subject to a personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with a surety and conditions including surrender within 15 days, non-tampering with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts