H.B Punith vs C.C Sajan Bopanna — 27/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Status: LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKD010002312025

LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2025

Filing Number

25/2025

Filing Date

14-02-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

17-02-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI

Judge

997-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

H.B Punith

Adv. KS KAVAN

Respondent(s)

C.C Sajan Bopanna

HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd.,

Hearing History

Judge: 997-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.

06-03-2026

LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS

24-02-2026

ISSUES

03-02-2026

OBJECTION Civil

08-01-2026

NOTICE

10-12-2025

COMMISSION REPORT

Interim Orders

22-08-2025
Deposition
19-09-2025
Deposition
24-10-2025
Deposition

Summary This is a case adjourned order from a Karnataka court (MVC 27/2025). The witness (PW-1) was examined regarding a two-wheeler accident that occurred on October 22, 2024, in which the witness claims to have sustained injuries due to rash and negligent driving. The witness's testimony was recorded, and the witness is recalled for further examination on October 24, 2025. The counsel for the opposing party (Respondent 1) was absent, so cross-examination could not proceed. The case proceedings are adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a case adjourned order from a Karnataka court (MVC 27/2025). The witness (PW-1) was examined regarding a two-wheeler accident that occurred on October 22, 2024, in which the witness claims to have sustained injuries due to rash and negligent driving. The witness's testimony was recorded, and the witness is recalled for further examination on October 24, 2025. The counsel for the opposing party (Respondent 1) was absent, so cross-examination could not proceed. The case proceedings are adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case