Suhail P H vs The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor — 85/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKD010002282026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
85/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
363-Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suhail P H
Adv. Giri A G
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Kodagu-Madikeri granted regular bail to Sri Suhail P.H. in Crime No. 25/2026, where he was accused of offences under sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 351(3), and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (related to an alleged assault incident). The court found the petitioner had made out reasonable grounds for bail despite the prosecution's concerns about witness tampering and absconding, noting the offences were not punishable with death or life imprisonment. The bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹5,00,000 with two sureties and six specific conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
05-Mar-2026
Objection Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Madikeri.
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 85/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Kodagu-Madikeri granted regular bail to Sri Suhail P.H. in Crime No. 25/2026, where he was accused of offences under sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 351(3), and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (related to an alleged assault incident). The court found the petitioner had made out reasonable grounds for bail despite the prosecution's concerns about witness tampering and absconding, noting the offences were not punishable with death or life imprisonment. The bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹5,00,000 with two sureties and six specific conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts