Rasheed P A vs The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor — 84/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKD010002272026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

84/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

84/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI

Judge

363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483

Petitioner(s)

Rasheed P A

Adv. Giri A G

Respondent(s)

The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS Criminal

05-03-2026

OBJECTION Criminal

04-03-2026

OBJECTION Criminal

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Orders

Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted regular bail to Sri Rasheed P.A. under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving alleged assault charges (Sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 351(3), and 352 BNS, 2023). The court found that while the offences are non-bailable and serious, they are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner's undertaking to furnish surety and comply with court conditions adequately addresses prosecution concerns about absconding or witness tampering. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹5,00,000 with two sureties and six conditions including regular court appearance, weekly police station reporting, and a prohibition on leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted regular bail to Sri Rasheed P.A. under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving alleged assault charges (Sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 351(3), and 352 BNS, 2023). The court found that while the offences are non-bailable and serious, they are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner's undertaking to furnish surety and comply with court conditions adequately addresses prosecution concerns about absconding or witness tampering. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹5,00,000 with two sureties and six conditions including regular court appearance, weekly police station reporting, and a prohibition on leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case