Siddik K I vs The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor — 82/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKD010002252026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

82/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

82/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI

Judge

363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483

Petitioner(s)

Siddik K I

Adv. Giri A G

Respondent(s)

The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS Criminal

05-03-2026

OBJECTION Criminal

04-03-2026

OBJECTION Criminal

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted regular bail to Sri Siddik K.I. in Crime No.25/2026 for alleged offences of criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation with common intention under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that while the offences are non-bailable, they are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner's willingness to furnish surety and comply with conditions adequately addresses prosecution concerns regarding witness tampering and absconding. The bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000/- with two sureties and six conditions including regular court appearance and weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted regular bail to Sri Siddik K.I. in Crime No.25/2026 for alleged offences of criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation with common intention under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that while the offences are non-bailable, they are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner's willingness to furnish surety and comply with conditions adequately addresses prosecution concerns regarding witness tampering and absconding. The bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000/- with two sureties and six conditions including regular court appearance and weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case