Siddik K I vs The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor — 82/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKD010002252026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
82/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
82/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI
Judge
363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddik K I
Adv. Giri A G
Respondent(s)
The State by Napoklu P S Advocate - Public Procecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 363-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MADIKERI.
Disposed
ORDERS
ARGUMENTS Criminal
OBJECTION Criminal
OBJECTION Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
| 05-03-2026 | OBJECTION Criminal |
| 04-03-2026 | OBJECTION Criminal |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted regular bail to Sri Siddik K.I. in Crime No.25/2026 for alleged offences of criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation with common intention under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that while the offences are non-bailable, they are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner's willingness to furnish surety and comply with conditions adequately addresses prosecution concerns regarding witness tampering and absconding. The bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000/- with two sureties and six conditions including regular court appearance and weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu granted regular bail to Sri Siddik K.I. in Crime No.25/2026 for alleged offences of criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation with common intention under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that while the offences are non-bailable, they are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and the petitioner's willingness to furnish surety and comply with conditions adequately addresses prosecution concerns regarding witness tampering and absconding. The bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000/- with two sureties and six conditions including regular court appearance and weekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts