The State Through Chittpur Excise PS vs Jemibai W/o Subhash Rathod Age 54 Yrs R/o Devantegnoor Tq.Shahabad Dt.Kalaburagi — 942/2024
Case under 32 38 (a) K.e. Act. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB820013932024
Filing Number
942/2024
Filing Date
17-12-2024
Registration No
942/2024
Registration Date
17-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
EXCISE PS, CHITTAPUR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Chittpur Excise PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Jemibai W/o Subhash Rathod Age 54 Yrs R/o Devantegnoor Tq.Shahabad Dt.Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
Disposed
CRIMINAL JUDGEMENT
CRIMINAL ARGUMENTS
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | CRIMINAL JUDGEMENT |
| 17-03-2026 | CRIMINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 27-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 942/2024 Court Decision: The accused Jemibai was acquitted of all charges under Sections 32 and 38(A) of the Karnataka Excise Act and Section 273 of the IPC. Key Reasoning: The court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case. The two panch witnesses (who were supposed to certify the seizure) turned hostile and testified that no panchanama was conducted in their presence, undermining the seizure's credibility. The court also noted the prosecution failed to prove the provisional shop belonged to the accused—the tax receipt obtained from the PDO did not establish her ownership. Material contradictions in witness testimony and the lack of independent recovery documentation rendered the seizure unreliable, making it impossible to prove possession or sale of illegal liquor beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 942/2024 Court Decision: The accused Jemibai was acquitted of all charges under Sections 32 and 38(A) of the Karnataka Excise Act and Section 273 of the IPC. Key Reasoning: The court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case. The two panch witnesses (who were supposed to certify the seizure) turned hostile and testified that no panchanama was conducted in their presence, undermining the seizure's credibility. The court also noted the prosecution failed to prove the provisional shop belonged to the accused—the tax receipt obtained from the PDO did not establish her ownership. Material contradictions in witness testimony and the lack of independent recovery documentation rendered the seizure unreliable, making it impossible to prove possession or sale of illegal liquor beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts