The State Through Chittpur Excise PS vs Jemibai W/o Subhash Rathod Age 54 Yrs R/o Devantegnoor Tq.Shahabad Dt.Kalaburagi — 942/2024

Case under 32 38 (a) K.e. Act. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB820013932024

Case disposed

Filing Number

942/2024

Filing Date

17-12-2024

Registration No

942/2024

Registration Date

17-12-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD

Judge

330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

EXCISE PS, CHITTAPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

32 38 (a) K.e. Act

Petitioner(s)

The State Through Chittpur Excise PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Jemibai W/o Subhash Rathod Age 54 Yrs R/o Devantegnoor Tq.Shahabad Dt.Kalaburagi

Hearing History

Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD

16-04-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

CRIMINAL JUDGEMENT

17-03-2026

CRIMINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

27-02-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: CC No. 942/2024 Court Decision: The accused Jemibai was acquitted of all charges under Sections 32 and 38(A) of the Karnataka Excise Act and Section 273 of the IPC. Key Reasoning: The court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case. The two panch witnesses (who were supposed to certify the seizure) turned hostile and testified that no panchanama was conducted in their presence, undermining the seizure's credibility. The court also noted the prosecution failed to prove the provisional shop belonged to the accused—the tax receipt obtained from the PDO did not establish her ownership. Material contradictions in witness testimony and the lack of independent recovery documentation rendered the seizure unreliable, making it impossible to prove possession or sale of illegal liquor beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

22-12-2025
Deposition
19-01-2026
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 942/2024 Court Decision: The accused Jemibai was acquitted of all charges under Sections 32 and 38(A) of the Karnataka Excise Act and Section 273 of the IPC. Key Reasoning: The court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case. The two panch witnesses (who were supposed to certify the seizure) turned hostile and testified that no panchanama was conducted in their presence, undermining the seizure's credibility. The court also noted the prosecution failed to prove the provisional shop belonged to the accused—the tax receipt obtained from the PDO did not establish her ownership. Material contradictions in witness testimony and the lack of independent recovery documentation rendered the seizure unreliable, making it impossible to prove possession or sale of illegal liquor beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case