The Karnataka Excise Department vs Sanjay Kumar S/o Davu Rathod Age 32 years Occ Labour work R/o Station tanda shahabad Tq Shahabad — 486/2023
Case under 32 38 (a) K.e. Act Section 13,14,15,32,38(A). Status: CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB820006522023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
486/2023
Filing Date
12-10-2023
Registration No
486/2023
Registration Date
12-10-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
EXCISE PS, CHITTAPUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Karnataka Excise Department
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Kumar S/o Davu Rathod Age 32 years Occ Labour work R/o Station tanda shahabad Tq Shahabad
Hearing History
Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 02-04-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 16-02-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 28-01-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case 486/2023 Summary In this excise case heard at Shahabad First Class Magistrate Court on 28.01.2026, a witness testified regarding an alleged illegal liquor seizure. The witness (Raghavendra Pamnakkar, 26, laborer) testified that he did not have knowledge of the seizure details, could not confirm signing the seizure document (NP-1), and contradicted the prosecution's account that ~2 liters of illicit liquor and ~10 liters of jaggery residue were seized from the accused Sanjay Kumar's house on 08.03.2023. The defense counsel declined to cross-examine. The witness testimony effectively undermined the prosecution's evidence through contradictions regarding the seizure procedure and documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 486/2023 Summary In this excise case heard at Shahabad First Class Magistrate Court on 28.01.2026, a witness testified regarding an alleged illegal liquor seizure. The witness (Raghavendra Pamnakkar, 26, laborer) testified that he did not have knowledge of the seizure details, could not confirm signing the seizure document (NP-1), and contradicted the prosecution's account that ~2 liters of illicit liquor and ~10 liters of jaggery residue were seized from the accused Sanjay Kumar's house on 08.03.2023. The defense counsel declined to cross-examine. The witness testimony effectively undermined the prosecution's evidence through contradictions regarding the seizure procedure and documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts