Ram @ Ramu S/o Saidappa Girani, Age 68 Yrs, Occ Retired ACC company employee, R/o H.no. 16-157 (old vs Abdul Rahiman S/o Mohd. Hajarath Hulla, Age 50 Yrs, Occ Business, R/o Chanda Bada, Gandhi Chowk, Sh — 21/2024
Case under Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc. Status: CIVIL Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB820005892024
Filing Number
21/2024
Filing Date
29-May-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
29-May-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
Last updated 14-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ram @ Ramu S/o Saidappa Girani, Age 68 Yrs, Occ Retired ACC company employee, R/o H.no. 16-157 (old
Adv. H Babankar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abdul Rahiman S/o Mohd. Hajarath Hulla, Age 50 Yrs, Occ Business, R/o Chanda Bada, Gandhi Chowk, Sh
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
21-Feb-2026
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
06-Feb-2026
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
04-Feb-2026
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
28-Jan-2026
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
14-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In this civil suit (OS.No.21/2024), the court examined witness PW.1 on 14-01-2026 regarding a dispute over a pathway. The defendant's counsel cross-examined the witness, challenging claims about obstruction of the road and the defendant's alleged renovation activities. The court found the defendant's counsel's arguments regarding false testimony and fabricated allegations in the plaintiff's pleadings to be without merit. The case was adjourned with no cross-examination further permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Jan-2026
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
07-Jan-2026
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
19-Dec-2025
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
03-Dec-2025
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
19-Nov-2025
Issues.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
29-Oct-2025
CIVIL Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
08-Oct-2025
CIVIL Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
01-Oct-2025
CIVIL Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
30-Jul-2025
CIVIL Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
03-Jul-2025
Criminal Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
13-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
Criminal Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
03-Jun-2025
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
29-Apr-2025
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
07-Apr-2025
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
05-Mar-2025
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
06-Jan-2025
CIVIL Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
16-Nov-2024
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
21-Oct-2024
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
09-Aug-2024
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
10-Jul-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
19-Jun-2024
First Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
07-Jun-2024
First Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
29-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2024
Summary: In this civil suit (OS.No.21/2024), the court examined witness PW.1 on 14-01-2026 regarding a dispute over a pathway. The defendant's counsel cross-examined the witness, challenging claims about obstruction of the road and the defendant's alleged renovation activities. The court found the defendant's counsel's arguments regarding false testimony and fabricated allegations in the plaintiff's pleadings to be without merit. The case was adjourned with no cross-examination further permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts