Abdul Nabi S/o Mohd. Khasim sab, Age 26 years occ Labour R/o Village Martur Tq chittapur dist kalab vs Banu D/o Nazeer W/o Abdul Nabi Age 21 occ Household R/o at present Ganesh Nagar, Bhankur Tq shahaba — 34/2019
Case under Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section VIIRule1. Status: CIVIL EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB820005292019
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
34/2019
Filing Date
08-11-2019
Registration No
34/2019
Registration Date
08-11-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Nabi S/o Mohd. Khasim sab, Age 26 years occ Labour R/o Village Martur Tq chittapur dist kalab
Adv. CHANDRAKANT. S. PUJARI
Respondent(s)
Banu D/o Nazeer W/o Abdul Nabi Age 21 occ Household R/o at present Ganesh Nagar, Bhankur Tq shahaba
Hearing History
Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
CIVIL EVIDENCE
CIVIL EVIDENCE
CIVIL EVIDENCE
CIVIL EVIDENCE
CIVIL EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | CIVIL EVIDENCE |
| 02-04-2026 | CIVIL EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | CIVIL EVIDENCE |
| 28-02-2026 | CIVIL EVIDENCE |
| 26-02-2026 | CIVIL EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 34/2019 Abdul Nabi v. Banu - On 18.12.2025, the court heard PW.1 (first witness) testimony after oath was administered. The petitioner's counsel presented multiple documents dated 24/10/2019, 06/12/2019, 18/11/2019, and 18/01/2020 (with both Urdu originals and English translations), which were marked as exhibits NP.4 through NP.11. The respondent's counsel requested and was granted time to file a written reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 34/2019 Abdul Nabi v. Banu - On 18.12.2025, the court heard PW.1 (first witness) testimony after oath was administered. The petitioner's counsel presented multiple documents dated 24/10/2019, 06/12/2019, 18/11/2019, and 18/01/2020 (with both Urdu originals and English translations), which were marked as exhibits NP.4 through NP.11. The respondent's counsel requested and was granted time to file a written reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts