Shahabad town p.s. vs Amruth S/o Balaram Huggi Age 38 occ coolie work R/o Tonsalli — 222/2020

Case under 87 of K.p.act Section 87. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY /PLEA BARGAINING on 13th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB820003522020

Filing Number

222/2020

Filing Date

07-Oct-2020

Registration No

222/2020

Registration Date

07-Oct-2020

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD

Judge

330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY /PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Cr No 156

Police Station

SHAHABAD TOWN PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

87 of K.p.act Section 87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shahabad town p.s.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amruth S/o Balaram Huggi Age 38 occ coolie work R/o Tonsalli

  2. 2.Shivakumar S/o Eshwar Huggi Age 30 occ coolier work R/o Tonsalli

  3. 3.Shivakumar S/o shamrao kognoor Age 24 occ coolie R/o Tonsalli

  4. 4.Mallanna S/o Bhimarao Maski Age 30 occ coolie work R/o Tonsalli

  5. 5.Sharanappa S/o Mallappa Huggi Age 31 occ coolie R/o Tonsalli

  6. 6.Raghu S/o Vithal Bhimalli Age 30 occ coolie R/o Tonsalli

  7. 7.Arjun S/o Chandrashekhar age 35 occ coolie work R/o Tonsalli

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    PleaView PDF

    The court convicted three accused—Amrut (38), Raghu (30), and Arjun (35)—for gambling with playing cards (Andar Bahar) while betting money on September 9, 2020, in violation of Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act. All three pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court accepted their pleas, sentencing each to pay a fine with default imprisonment, relying on old provisions of the Karnataka Police Act after citing All India Gaming Federation v/s State of Karnataka precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  7. 03-Oct-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  8. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  9. 23-Jun-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  11. 05-Feb-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  12. 22-Nov-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  13. 03-Sep-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  14. 02-Jul-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  15. 24-Apr-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  16. 06-Mar-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  17. 14-Dec-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  18. 07-Oct-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  19. 18-Aug-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  20. 06-Jul-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  21. 06-Jun-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  22. 05-Apr-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  23. 04-Apr-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  24. 09-Mar-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  25. 08-Mar-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  26. 11-Feb-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  27. 07-Feb-2023

    Stayed.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  28. 20-Jan-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  29. 06-Dec-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  30. 05-Nov-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  31. 06-Oct-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  32. 10-Aug-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  33. 26-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  34. 20-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  35. 22-Jun-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  36. 26-May-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  37. 11-Mar-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  38. 19-Feb-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  39. 17-Dec-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  40. 18-Nov-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  41. 28-Sep-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  42. 16-Aug-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  43. 25-Jun-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  44. 20-May-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  45. 17-Mar-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  46. 08-Feb-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  47. 22-Dec-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  48. 18-Nov-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 07-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted three accused—Amrut (38), Raghu (30), and Arjun (35)—for gambling with playing cards (Andar Bahar) while betting money on September 9, 2020, in violation of Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act. All three pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court accepted their pleas, sentencing each to pay a fine with default imprisonment, relying on old provisions of the Karnataka Police Act after citing All India Gaming Federation v/s State of Karnataka precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case