The State Excise P.S. Chittapur. vs Mallikarjuna S/o Basalingappa Pagalapure, Age 40 years, Occ. Labour. — 100/2025
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 11,14,15,32,38(A),43. Status: CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB820002752025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
101/2025
Filing Date
29-05-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
29-05-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
EXCISE PS, CHITTAPUR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Excise P.S. Chittapur.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mallikarjuna S/o Basalingappa Pagalapure, Age 40 years, Occ. Labour.
Hearing History
Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 15-04-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 24-02-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 12-02-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.No. 100/2025 Outcome: Case dismissed. The court found the prosecution witness's testimony unreliable and rejected the charge sheet against the accused Mallikarjuna. The witness (an Excise SI) was found to have fabricated evidence, falsely claimed investigative steps, and admitted under cross-examination that seized items were missing and that charges were filed to boost police statistics rather than on genuine evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.No. 100/2025 Outcome: Case dismissed. The court found the prosecution witness's testimony unreliable and rejected the charge sheet against the accused Mallikarjuna. The witness (an Excise SI) was found to have fabricated evidence, falsely claimed investigative steps, and admitted under cross-examination that seized items were missing and that charges were filed to boost police statistics rather than on genuine evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts