Mohammed Ubaid So Mohammed Muktum vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Chittapur — 219/2026

Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB820002632026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

219/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

219/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD

Judge

330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Ubaid So Mohammed Muktum

    Adv. Ramesh R.Rathod

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Chittapur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 219/2026 Summary: The court allowed Mohammed Ubaid's petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act against the Registrar Birth and Death, Tahasildar Office Chittapur on March 14, 2026. The order was signed by both the Advocate Conciliator and Judicial Conciliator. The judgment does not specify the underlying grounds or relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 219/2026 Summary: The court allowed Mohammed Ubaid's petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act against the Registrar Birth and Death, Tahasildar Office Chittapur on March 14, 2026. The order was signed by both the Advocate Conciliator and Judicial Conciliator. The judgment does not specify the underlying grounds or relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case