Devaraj M So Mareppa Age 22 Years Occ Student Ro Chamanoor Village Tq Chittapur Dist Kalaburagi vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur Tq Chittapur Dist Kalaburagi — 208/2026

Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB820002522026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

208/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

208/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD

Judge

330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Devaraj M So Mareppa Age 22 Years Occ Student Ro Chamanoor Village Tq Chittapur Dist Kalaburagi

    Adv. D.C.Kulkundikar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur Tq Chittapur Dist Kalaburagi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed by 22-year-old student Devaraj M against the Registrar of Birth and Death, Chittapur, under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act on March 14, 2026. The specific grounds for the petition and detailed reasoning are not provided in this order document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by 22-year-old student Devaraj M against the Registrar of Birth and Death, Chittapur, under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act on March 14, 2026. The specific grounds for the petition and detailed reasoning are not provided in this order document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case