SMT. BANU W/o ABDUL NABI AGE 24, OCC HOUSEHOLD R/o POST GANESH NAGAR, BHANKUR TQ. SHAHABAD . vs ABDUL NABI S/oMAHMAD KASIM SAB AGE 29 OCC,GOUNDI AND AGRI. R/o MARTUR TQ. SHAHABAD — 23/2023
Case under Under Sec 125 of Cr P.c Section 125,OF,CRPC. Status: CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB820002362023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-03-2023
Filing Number
23/2023
Filing Date
02-03-2023
Registration No
23/2023
Registration Date
02-03-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. BANU W/o ABDUL NABI AGE 24, OCC HOUSEHOLD R/o POST GANESH NAGAR, BHANKUR TQ. SHAHABAD .
Adv. Ramesh R.Rathod
MALLIKA D/O ABDUL NABI AGE U/G BANU W/O ABDUL NABI AGE 24 R/O GANESH NAGAR BHANKUR, TQ.SHAHABAD
Respondent(s)
ABDUL NABI S/oMAHMAD KASIM SAB AGE 29 OCC,GOUNDI AND AGRI. R/o MARTUR TQ. SHAHABAD
Hearing History
Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
REJECTION OF PLAINT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | REJECTION OF PLAINT |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.23/2023 On 06-01-2026, the court heard testimony from PW.1 and recorded their examination. The petitioner's counsel submitted the main case evidence through an affidavit and presented supporting documents: (1) the Nikahnama (marriage certificate) marked as NIPI-1 and its translation as NIPI-1(A), (2) birth certificate of petitioner no.2 marked as NIPI-2, and (3) two photographs taken at the time of marriage marked as NIPI-3. The court adjourned the case for continued main arguments, with adjournment granted as requested by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.23/2023 On 06-01-2026, the court heard testimony from PW.1 and recorded their examination. The petitioner's counsel submitted the main case evidence through an affidavit and presented supporting documents: (1) the Nikahnama (marriage certificate) marked as NIPI-1 and its translation as NIPI-1(A), (2) birth certificate of petitioner no.2 marked as NIPI-2, and (3) two photographs taken at the time of marriage marked as NIPI-3. The court adjourned the case for continued main arguments, with adjournment granted as requested by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts