Ambika Do Ramanna Age 24 Years Occ Student Ro Near Eshwar Temple Bhankur Tq Shahabad Dist Kalaburag vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Shahabad. — 127/2026

Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 13th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB820001692026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

127/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD

Judge

330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ambika Do Ramanna Age 24 Years Occ Student Ro Near Eshwar Temple Bhankur Tq Shahabad Dist Kalaburag

    Adv. Ramesh. A. Malkud

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Shahabad.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the petitioner's petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act on 14/03/2026. The order was signed by both an Advocate Conciliator and Judicial Conciliator, though the judgment does not detail the specific grounds or reasoning for the allowance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner's petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act on 14/03/2026. The order was signed by both an Advocate Conciliator and Judicial Conciliator, though the judgment does not detail the specific grounds or reasoning for the allowance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case