AFREEN D/O HAJI KAREEM U/G MOTHER JAITUN BEE AGE.27 YEARS. vs The Registrar Birth and Death CMC Shahabad. — 125/2026
Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 11th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB820001672026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
125/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AFREEN D/O HAJI KAREEM U/G MOTHER JAITUN BEE AGE.27 YEARS.
Adv. SRI. M.A.KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Birth and Death CMC Shahabad.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The court (Lok-Adalath) allowed multiple petitions filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act. In each case, the petitioner and respondent reached a settlement through conciliation, filing joint consent memos. The court directed the respondent (civil registrar) to enter the dates of birth for various individuals in the official birth register and issue birth certificates upon payment of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
07-Mar-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 125/2026
Summary The court (Lok-Adalath) allowed multiple petitions filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act. In each case, the petitioner and respondent reached a settlement through conciliation, filing joint consent memos. The court directed the respondent (civil registrar) to enter the dates of birth for various individuals in the official birth register and issue birth certificates upon payment of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts