ARMAN S/O GAFOOR SAB UN/GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER NASEEMA vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Shahabad. — 117/2026
Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 11th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB820001592026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
117/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARMAN S/O GAFOOR SAB UN/GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER NASEEMA
Adv. Veeresh Bhatt joshi
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Shahabad.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Lok-Adalath (a conciliation-based alternative dispute resolution forum) allowed multiple petitions filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act. In each case, the court directed the respondent (civil registration authority) to register the petitioner's date of birth in the official register and issue a birth certificate upon payment of the prescribed fee, following settlement between parties through joint consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
07-Mar-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 117/2026
Court Decision Summary The Lok-Adalath (a conciliation-based alternative dispute resolution forum) allowed multiple petitions filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act. In each case, the court directed the respondent (civil registration authority) to register the petitioner's date of birth in the official register and issue a birth certificate upon payment of the prescribed fee, following settlement between parties through joint consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts