ARMAN S/O GAFOOR SAB UN/GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER NASEEMA vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Shahabad. — 117/2026

Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 11th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB820001592026

Case disposedSub Stage

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

117/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD

Judge

330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

KARNATAKA REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS RULES, 1999 Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

ARMAN S/O GAFOOR SAB UN/GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER NASEEMA

Adv. Veeresh Bhatt joshi

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Office Shahabad.

Hearing History

Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

NOTICE

04-03-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary The Lok-Adalath (a conciliation-based alternative dispute resolution forum) allowed multiple petitions filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act. In each case, the court directed the respondent (civil registration authority) to register the petitioner's date of birth in the official register and issue a birth certificate upon payment of the prescribed fee, following settlement between parties through joint consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Lok-Adalath (a conciliation-based alternative dispute resolution forum) allowed multiple petitions filed under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act. In each case, the court directed the respondent (civil registration authority) to register the petitioner's date of birth in the official register and issue a birth certificate upon payment of the prescribed fee, following settlement between parties through joint consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case