Jyoti D/o Shelgeppa age 16 yrs U/G of father Shelgeppa S/o Devindrappa age 40 yrs Occ coolie vs The Tahasildar Office Shahabad. Tq. Chiitapur Dist.Kalaburagi. — 35/2026
Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB820000542026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2026
Filing Number
35/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jyoti D/o Shelgeppa age 16 yrs U/G of father Shelgeppa S/o Devindrappa age 40 yrs Occ coolie
Adv. S.S. Gangani
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahasildar Office Shahabad. Tq. Chiitapur Dist.Kalaburagi.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 35/2026 Decision: The court allowed the petition filed by 16-year-old Jyoti (represented by her father Shelgeppa) against the Tahasildar Office Shahabad under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act on 14/03/2026. The specific relief granted relates to birth registration matters, though detailed grounds are not provided in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
13-Mar-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
02-Mar-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
24-Feb-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Shahabad
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2026
Case Summary: 35/2026 Decision: The court allowed the petition filed by 16-year-old Jyoti (represented by her father Shelgeppa) against the Tahasildar Office Shahabad under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act on 14/03/2026. The specific relief granted relates to birth registration matters, though detailed grounds are not provided in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts