The State Through Shahabad (T) PS vs Malleshi S/o Ningappa Jirakal Age 38 Yrs R/o Muttaga Tq.Shahabad Dt.Kalaburagi — 16/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB820000312025
e-Filing Number
18-01-2025
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
20-01-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,SHAHABAD
Judge
330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0104
Police Station
SHAHABAD TOWN PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Through Shahabad (T) PS (Police Station)
Adv. sunita.s gattu
Respondent(s)
Malleshi S/o Ningappa Jirakal Age 38 Yrs R/o Muttaga Tq.Shahabad Dt.Kalaburagi
Siddaram S/o Shamaray Pattedar Age 34 Yrs R/o Muttaga Tq.Shahabad Dt.Kalaburagi
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 330-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHAHABAD
Disposed
CRIMINAL JUDGEMENT
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-03-2026 | CRIMINAL JUDGEMENT |
| 12-02-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 02-02-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
| 22-01-2026 | CRIMINAL EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 16/2025 Court Decision: Accused No. 1 (Malleshi) was acquitted of charges under BNS-2023 Sections 281, 125(a), and 106 (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because the sole material witness (the complainant, mother of the deceased) turned hostile and could not identify the accused or describe how the accident occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 16/2025 Court Decision: Accused No. 1 (Malleshi) was acquitted of charges under BNS-2023 Sections 281, 125(a), and 106 (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because the sole material witness (the complainant, mother of the deceased) turned hostile and could not identify the accused or describe how the accident occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts