Soubhagyalaxmi W/o Santosh Kumar vs Raghavendra S/o Veeranna — 107/2025

Case under Under Order 9 Rule 13 Read with Sec 151 of Cpc Section VIIrule1and3ofcpc. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB720040462025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-12-2025

Filing Number

107/2025

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

107/2025

Registration Date

04-12-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Under Order 9 Rule 13 Read with Sec 151 of Cpc Section VIIrule1and3ofcpc

Petitioner(s)

Soubhagyalaxmi W/o Santosh Kumar

Adv. Nagesh mitti

Respondent(s)

Raghavendra S/o Veeranna

Ambibai W/o Venkat Chawan

Saroja W/o Ramachandra

Renuka W/o Vijaya Kumar

Pramila W/o Basavanth Reddy

Jayandra S/o Kiste Nayak

Khaleel S/o Shameen Patel

Kavita W/o Tulsiram

Daulathbee W/o Chand Pasha

Devala Nayak S/o Chandra Nayak

Vijaykumar S/o Venkatesh

Hearing History

Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

A.D.R.

02-03-2026

A.D.R.

16-02-2026

HEARING

04-02-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok Adalath decreed the suit between petitioner Soubhagyalaxmi and respondents Raghavendra, Ambibai, and Saroja based on a compromise petition filed by both parties on 14.03.2026. The court verified the parties' identities through Aadhaar cards, confirmed they voluntarily accepted the compromise terms, and issued a decree incorporating the compromise petition as its integral part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

04-12-2025
Orders
casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath decreed the suit between petitioner Soubhagyalaxmi and respondents Raghavendra, Ambibai, and Saroja based on a compromise petition filed by both parties on 14.03.2026. The court verified the parties' identities through Aadhaar cards, confirmed they voluntarily accepted the compromise terms, and issued a decree incorporating the compromise petition as its integral part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case