Ibrahim Patel s/o Ismail Patel vs The Tahasildar sedam Tq sedam — 2574/2025

Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB720037892025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-11-2025

Filing Number

2576/2025

Filing Date

17-11-2025

Registration No

2574/2025

Registration Date

17-11-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Petitioner(s)

Ibrahim Patel s/o Ismail Patel

Adv. HANAMAPPA MALLAPPA

Respondent(s)

The Tahasildar sedam Tq sedam

Hearing History

Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam

06-03-2026

Disposed

04-02-2026

HEARING

31-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

26-12-2025

FIRST HEARING

18-11-2025

FIRST HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge and JMFC, Sedam allowed Ibrahim Patel's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar Sedam to register his birth (dated 01-08-1979) in the birth register after collecting applicable late fees. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, school transfer certificate, and identity documents (Voter ID and Aadhar card) to establish his date of birth, with no contradictory materials presented by the respondent who remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

04-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge and JMFC, Sedam allowed Ibrahim Patel's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar Sedam to register his birth (dated 01-08-1979) in the birth register after collecting applicable late fees. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, school transfer certificate, and identity documents (Voter ID and Aadhar card) to establish his date of birth, with no contradictory materials presented by the respondent who remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case