Ibrahim Patel s/o Ismail Patel vs The Tahasildar sedam Tq sedam — 2574/2025
Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB720037892025
e-Filing Number
07-11-2025
Filing Number
2576/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
2574/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Petitioner(s)
Ibrahim Patel s/o Ismail Patel
Adv. HANAMAPPA MALLAPPA
Respondent(s)
The Tahasildar sedam Tq sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Disposed
HEARING
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
FIRST HEARING
FIRST HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 26-12-2025 | FIRST HEARING |
| 18-11-2025 | FIRST HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge and JMFC, Sedam allowed Ibrahim Patel's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar Sedam to register his birth (dated 01-08-1979) in the birth register after collecting applicable late fees. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, school transfer certificate, and identity documents (Voter ID and Aadhar card) to establish his date of birth, with no contradictory materials presented by the respondent who remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge and JMFC, Sedam allowed Ibrahim Patel's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar Sedam to register his birth (dated 01-08-1979) in the birth register after collecting applicable late fees. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, school transfer certificate, and identity documents (Voter ID and Aadhar card) to establish his date of birth, with no contradictory materials presented by the respondent who remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts