M/s Patil Traders Seda thorugh its prop.Smt.Chandrakala W/o Ambarao Patil Age 50yrs Occ Business R/ vs Sampathkumar S/o Shivasharanappa Bhanji Age 47yrs Occ Agri.and Business R/o Basavanagar Sedam Tq.Se — 1858/2024

Case under U/s 200 of Crpc Section U/sec138. Status: Evidence-Criminal. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Evidence-Criminal Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB720034872024

Filing Number

1859/2024

Filing Date

20-Jul-2024

Registration No

1858/2024

Registration Date

20-Jul-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

329-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 200 of Crpc Section U/sec138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Patil Traders Seda thorugh its prop.Smt.Chandrakala W/o Ambarao Patil Age 50yrs Occ Business R/

    Adv. Rajendra R M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sampathkumar S/o Shivasharanappa Bhanji Age 47yrs Occ Agri.and Business R/o Basavanagar Sedam Tq.Se

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  4. 24-Jan-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  6. 25-Oct-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  7. 27-Sep-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  8. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  9. 02-Aug-2025

    PleaView PDF

    This is a criminal complaint case (C.C. No. 1858/2024) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act filed by M/s Patil Traders Sedam against Sampathkumar for issuing a post-dated cheque of Rs. 49,155 dated 18.02.2022 that was returned for insufficient funds. The accused's answers to the charge (plea of guilty or defence) are not filled in the order. The court certified on 02.08.2025 that the accusation was read over and explained to the accused in a known language and his statement was recorded, but no substantive order on conviction, acquittal, or bail has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence-Criminal

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  11. 28-Jun-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  12. 04-Jun-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  13. 05-Apr-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  14. 27-Feb-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  15. 18-Dec-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  16. 06-Nov-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  17. 26-Oct-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  18. 07-Oct-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  19. 10-Sep-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  20. 17-Aug-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  21. 06-Aug-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  22. 03-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 20-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1858/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a criminal complaint case (C.C. No. 1858/2024) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act filed by M/s Patil Traders Sedam against Sampathkumar for issuing a post-dated cheque of Rs. 49,155 dated 18.02.2022 that was returned for insufficient funds. The accused's answers to the charge (plea of guilty or defence) are not filled in the order. The court certified on 02.08.2025 that the accusation was read over and explained to the accused in a known language and his statement was recorded, but no substantive order on conviction, acquittal, or bail has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case