Shaik jalalsab vs The chief officer Tmc sedam Tq sedam — 2366/2025
Case under 13 Class 3 Birth and Death Reg Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB720033002025
e-Filing Number
02-09-2025
Filing Number
2368/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
2366/2025
Registration Date
10-09-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaik jalalsab
Adv. HANAMAPPA MALLAPPA
Respondent(s)
The chief officer Tmc sedam Tq sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-12-2025 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sedam Civil Court allowed the petition filed by Shaik Jalalsab under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, seeking registration of his birth (dated 10-05-1972) in the birth register. The court found that the petitioner's parents failed to register his birth due to unavoidable circumstances and accepted his testimony supported by Aadhar card and voter ID as proof of identity and date of birth. The respondent authority was directed to enter the petitioner's birth details in the register after collecting applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sedam Civil Court allowed the petition filed by Shaik Jalalsab under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, seeking registration of his birth (dated 10-05-1972) in the birth register. The court found that the petitioner's parents failed to register his birth due to unavoidable circumstances and accepted his testimony supported by Aadhar card and voter ID as proof of identity and date of birth. The respondent authority was directed to enter the petitioner's birth details in the register after collecting applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts