Sridhar Reddy S/o Madhusudhanreddy Mali Patil vs Srikanthreddy S/o madhusudhanreddy Mali Patil — 51/2025

Case under 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section 7. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB720026232025

e-Filing Number

28-07-2025

Filing Number

51/2025

Filing Date

29-Jul-2025

Registration No

51/2025

Registration Date

29-Jul-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

329-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sridhar Reddy S/o Madhusudhanreddy Mali Patil

    Adv. Gopal Rathod

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Srikanthreddy S/o madhusudhanreddy Mali Patil

  2. 2.Soubhagyalaxmi W/o Madhusudhanreddy Mali Patil

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  10. 24-Oct-2025

    Objection

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 51/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction granted in favor of plaintiff. The court allowed the plaintiff's application for ad-interim temporary injunction, restraining the defendants and anyone claiming through them from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of land Sy. No.376/2 (measuring 01 acre 02 guntas) in Mudhol village until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on a 2015 compromise decree and valid revenue records showing him as the registered owner, and determined that balance of convenience and risk of irreparable loss favored granting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  16. 10-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  17. 09-Sep-2025

    Objection

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  18. 14-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  19. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  21. 29-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 29-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 51/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction granted in favor of plaintiff. The court allowed the plaintiff's application for ad-interim temporary injunction, restraining the defendants and anyone claiming through them from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of land Sy. No.376/2 (measuring 01 acre 02 guntas) in Mudhol village until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on a 2015 compromise decree and valid revenue records showing him as the registered owner, and determined that balance of convenience and risk of irreparable loss favored granting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case