Sedam PS vs TEJAMMA — 700/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),54,351(2),352,r/w3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 21st May 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB720025722025

e-Filing Number

17-07-2025

Filing Number

700/2025

Filing Date

18-Jul-2025

Registration No

700/2025

Registration Date

18-Jul-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

329-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0153

Police Station

SEDAM PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),54,351(2),352,r/w3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sedam PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TEJAMMA

  2. 2.MUKRAM KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the complainant's application for compounding the case under Section 359 of BNSS-2023, finding the settlement was voluntary and not opposed to natural justice. Both accused were acquitted of offences under Sections 126(2), 54, 351(2), and 352 read with Section 3(5) of BNS, and the case was disposed as settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  11. 21-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 18-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 700/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the complainant's application for compounding the case under Section 359 of BNSS-2023, finding the settlement was voluntary and not opposed to natural justice. Both accused were acquitted of offences under Sections 126(2), 54, 351(2), and 352 read with Section 3(5) of BNS, and the case was disposed as settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case