state through sedam ps vs Rahul So Shankar Kundar Age 20 year Occ Collie Ro Sedam Tq Sedam — 769/2015
Case under Ipc Act Section 279304AIPCreadwith187IMVAct. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB720018872015
Filing Number
769/2015
Filing Date
29-12-2015
Registration No
769/2015
Registration Date
29-12-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
231
Police Station
SEDAM PS
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state through sedam ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Rahul So Shankar Kundar Age 20 year Occ Collie Ro Sedam Tq Sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State vs. Rahul S/o Shankar Kundar (C.C. No. 769/2015) Court Decision: The accused, Rahul (age 20), was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving), 304(A) (causing death by negligence), and Motor Vehicles Act Section 187 (hit-and-run). Key Reasoning: While the court confirmed that a fatal motorcycle accident occurred on September 20, 2015, killing Abhilash, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove rashly or negligently. The eyewitness testimony was contradictory and unreliable—the primary witness admitted inability to identify the motorcycle or describe the driver's speed. Evidence indicated a speed breaker existed at the accident location, suggesting slow driving. No conclusive evidence proved the death resulted from the accused's fault rather than other factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State vs. Rahul S/o Shankar Kundar (C.C. No. 769/2015) Court Decision: The accused, Rahul (age 20), was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving), 304(A) (causing death by negligence), and Motor Vehicles Act Section 187 (hit-and-run). Key Reasoning: While the court confirmed that a fatal motorcycle accident occurred on September 20, 2015, killing Abhilash, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove rashly or negligently. The eyewitness testimony was contradictory and unreliable—the primary witness admitted inability to identify the motorcycle or describe the driver's speed. Evidence indicated a speed breaker existed at the accident location, suggesting slow driving. No conclusive evidence proved the death resulted from the accused's fault rather than other factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts