M/s. Santoshi w/o Ravi, 30 years, Occ Agri and Business, R/o Silarkot, Tq Sedam. vs Mr. Harish Shetty, For Swad Family, Restaurant and Bar Properietor Virar (W) Tq. Vasai — 18/2021
Case under U/s 138 of N.i. Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAKB720016032021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
18/2021
Filing Date
18-06-2021
Registration No
18/2021
Registration Date
18-06-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s. Santoshi w/o Ravi, 30 years, Occ Agri and Business, R/o Silarkot, Tq Sedam.
Adv. KORA ASHOK SHANTAPPA
Respondent(s)
Mr. Harish Shetty, For Swad Family, Restaurant and Bar Properietor Virar (W) Tq. Vasai
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-12-2025 | HEARING | |
| 25-10-2025 | HEARING | |
| 22-09-2025 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: In case CM 18/2021, the JMFC Sedam dismissed the case for non-prosecution. The complainant was absent during the hearing, and although counsel requested an adjournment, the court found no valid grounds to grant it, having already provided sufficient time previously. The court rejected the adjournment plea and dismissed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case CM 18/2021, the JMFC Sedam dismissed the case for non-prosecution. The complainant was absent during the hearing, and although counsel requested an adjournment, the court found no valid grounds to grant it, having already provided sufficient time previously. The court rejected the adjournment plea and dismissed the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts