Shivanand S/o BASAVARAJ vs MANJULA W/o Srinivas Madival — 33/2025

Case under 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section ORDER7RULE1AND2. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Summons Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB720014852025

e-Filing Number

06-06-2025

Filing Number

33/2025

Filing Date

10-Jun-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

10-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

329-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section ORDER7RULE1AND2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivanand S/o BASAVARAJ

    Adv. Shantkumar B. Hiremath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANJULA W/o Srinivas Madival

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  14. 07-Jan-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  18. 26-Nov-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  19. 18-Nov-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  20. 13-Nov-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  21. 16-Oct-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  22. 23-Sep-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  23. 15-Sep-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  24. 08-Sep-2025

    Objection

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  25. 01-Sep-2025

    Objection

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  26. 14-Aug-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 33/2025 The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant Manjula from constructing a building on the plaintiff Shivanand's property. The plaintiff, who purchased his plot in 2009 and constructed his house in 2012-13, left a 1.5-foot space on the northern side for drainage. The defendant began constructing on adjacent plots 17-18 without maintaining the setback, allegedly encroaching onto the plaintiff's property. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and without the injunction he would suffer irreparable loss. The injunction remains in effect until final trial disposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 14-Aug-2025

    Objection

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  28. 24-Jul-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  29. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  30. 14-Jul-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  31. 07-Jul-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  32. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam

  33. 10-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 10-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 33/2025 The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant Manjula from constructing a building on the plaintiff Shivanand's property. The plaintiff, who purchased his plot in 2009 and constructed his house in 2012-13, left a 1.5-foot space on the northern side for drainage. The defendant began constructing on adjacent plots 17-18 without maintaining the setback, allegedly encroaching onto the plaintiff's property. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and without the injunction he would suffer irreparable loss. The injunction remains in effect until final trial disposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case