Shivanand S/o BASAVARAJ vs MANJULA W/o Srinivas Madival — 33/2025
Case under 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section ORDER7RULE1AND2. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB720014852025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-06-2025
Filing Number
33/2025
Filing Date
10-06-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
10-06-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivanand S/o BASAVARAJ
Adv. Shantkumar B. Hiremath
Respondent(s)
MANJULA W/o Srinivas Madival
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 02-04-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 33/2025 The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant Manjula from constructing a building on the plaintiff Shivanand's property. The plaintiff, who purchased his plot in 2009 and constructed his house in 2012-13, left a 1.5-foot space on the northern side for drainage. The defendant began constructing on adjacent plots 17-18 without maintaining the setback, allegedly encroaching onto the plaintiff's property. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and without the injunction he would suffer irreparable loss. The injunction remains in effect until final trial disposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 33/2025 The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant Manjula from constructing a building on the plaintiff Shivanand's property. The plaintiff, who purchased his plot in 2009 and constructed his house in 2012-13, left a 1.5-foot space on the northern side for drainage. The defendant began constructing on adjacent plots 17-18 without maintaining the setback, allegedly encroaching onto the plaintiff's property. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him, and without the injunction he would suffer irreparable loss. The injunction remains in effect until final trial disposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts