Laxmi finance corporation Sedam through its manager SPA holder namely K Narsimlu Son of Balaiah vs Suryakanth Son of Imamjee Hulikeri Age major Occ Business Resident of near police station Kottapall Advocate - RAJENDRA R.MUNNUR — 585/2016
Case under U/s 138 of N.i. Act Section 138. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB720013672016
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
585/2016
Filing Date
19-07-2016
Registration No
585/2016
Registration Date
19-07-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi finance corporation Sedam through its manager SPA holder namely K Narsimlu Son of Balaiah
Adv. S.K.DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
Suryakanth Son of Imamjee Hulikeri Age major Occ Business Resident of near police station Kottapall Advocate - RAJENDRA R.MUNNUR
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 24-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 20-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 22-11-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a criminal case (P.P.No. 585/2014) from the Karnataka High Court dated 05-08-2017. The court found the accused guilty under IPC Sections 341, 504, 323, 324, and 506 (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and using abusive language). The court convicted two accused persons and imposed appropriate sentences under the identified sections, with the case being disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a criminal case (P.P.No. 585/2014) from the Karnataka High Court dated 05-08-2017. The court found the accused guilty under IPC Sections 341, 504, 323, 324, and 506 (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and using abusive language). The court convicted two accused persons and imposed appropriate sentences under the identified sections, with the case being disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts