Govind S/o Laxman vs The Tahasildar Sedam — 699/2025
Case under 13 Class 3 Birth and Death Reg Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB720011742025
e-Filing Number
01-03-2025
Filing Number
699/2025
Filing Date
10-03-2025
Registration No
699/2025
Registration Date
10-03-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govind S/o Laxman
Adv. Vishwanath rathod
Respondent(s)
The Tahasildar Sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Disposed
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 22-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 04-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 07-08-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
In Criminal Misc. 699/2025, the Chief Judge & JMFC, Sedam dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner and their counsel were absent when the case was called, and despite sufficient time already being granted, no valid ground for adjournment was presented, leading to dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Criminal Misc. 699/2025, the Chief Judge & JMFC, Sedam dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner and their counsel were absent when the case was called, and despite sufficient time already being granted, no valid ground for adjournment was presented, leading to dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts