state complt Krishnakumar PSI Malkhed ps vs Ambanna @ Ambrish son of Yankappa Waddar aage 20yrs occ T Driver ro Malkhed — 296/2016

Case under Ipc Act Section 379ofIPCandsec21ofMMRDAct. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB720006712016

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

296/2016

Filing Date

07-04-2016

Registration No

296/2016

Registration Date

07-04-2016

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

MALKHED PS

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Ipc Act Section 379ofIPCandsec21ofMMRDAct

Petitioner(s)

state complt Krishnakumar PSI Malkhed ps (Police Station)

Adv. app

Respondent(s)

Ambanna @ Ambrish son of Yankappa Waddar aage 20yrs occ T Driver ro Malkhed

Manju son of Tippanna Pujari age 20 yrs occ coolie ro Bibballi

Tirupati son of Yankappa Waddar age 22 yrs occ coolie ro Malkhed

Hearing History

Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam

06-05-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

12-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

08-01-2026
Plea
08-01-2026
Orders

Case Summary: 296/2016 Accused No.1 and No.2 were convicted under Section 379 IPC (theft) after voluntarily pleading guilty. The court dismissed the MMRD Act charges, holding that such offences require a private complaint from authorized persons, not police reports. Order: Both accused sentenced to pay Rs. 5,000 fine each; in default, 2 months simple imprisonment. A non-bailable warrant was re-issued against Accused No.3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 296/2016 Accused No.1 and No.2 were convicted under Section 379 IPC (theft) after voluntarily pleading guilty. The court dismissed the MMRD Act charges, holding that such offences require a private complaint from authorized persons, not police reports. Order: Both accused sentenced to pay Rs. 5,000 fine each; in default, 2 months simple imprisonment. A non-bailable warrant was re-issued against Accused No.3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case