Akash S/o Manjunath vs The Tashildar Sedam — 445/2025
Case under Birth and Death Registration Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB720005732025
e-Filing Number
21-02-2025
Filing Number
445/2025
Filing Date
04-03-2025
Registration No
445/2025
Registration Date
04-03-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akash S/o Manjunath
Adv. Dattatraya Bassanna
Respondent(s)
The Tashildar Sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Disposed
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 27-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 13-09-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 23-08-2025 | A.D.R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
In Crl. Misc. 445/2025, the Chief Judicial Magistrate & JMFC, Sedam dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner and their counsel were absent when the case was called, and sufficient time had already been granted; the court found no valid grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Crl. Misc. 445/2025, the Chief Judicial Magistrate & JMFC, Sedam dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner and their counsel were absent when the case was called, and sufficient time had already been granted; the court found no valid grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts