Akash S/o Manjunath vs The Tashildar Sedam — 445/2025
Case under Birth and Death Registration Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB720005732025
e-Filing Number
21-02-2025
Filing Number
445/2025
Filing Date
04-Mar-2025
Registration No
445/2025
Registration Date
04-Mar-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED /REJECTED OTHERWISE
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akash S/o Manjunath
Adv. Dattatraya Bassanna
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tashildar Sedam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In Crl. Misc. 445/2025, the Chief Judicial Magistrate & JMFC, Sedam dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner and their counsel were absent when the case was called, and sufficient time had already been granted; the court found no valid grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
13-Sep-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
23-Aug-2025
A.D.R.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
26-May-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
24-May-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
05-Apr-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC,Sedam
-
04-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 445/2025
In Crl. Misc. 445/2025, the Chief Judicial Magistrate & JMFC, Sedam dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner and their counsel were absent when the case was called, and sufficient time had already been granted; the court found no valid grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts