Santoshkumar Son of Ananthrao Kulkarni Age 42 yrs Occ Agri and business Resi of Sedam vs Mahesh Son of Chandrashekhar Yalmani Age 36 yrs Occ Business and agri Resi of Halkartigalli Sedam — 1/2021
Case under Ipc Act Section 379420415. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAKB720000182021
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2021
Filing Date
06-01-2021
Registration No
1/2021
Registration Date
06-01-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santoshkumar Son of Ananthrao Kulkarni Age 42 yrs Occ Agri and business Resi of Sedam
Adv. RAJENDRA R.MUNNUR
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Son of Chandrashekhar Yalmani Age 36 yrs Occ Business and agri Resi of Halkartigalli Sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 329-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. JMFC,Sedam
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 31-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 03-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 29-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The court (PCR 01/2021, in Kannada) allowed the petitioner's plea and directed that the case against the respondent be decided on merits. The petitioner alleged a business dispute with the respondent involving a bounced cheque (No. 501431) issued in 2018, subsequent non-recovery attempts, and claims of cheque fraud and misrepresentation. After recording witness testimony on 23.03.2022 and 18.06.2022, the court admitted the documentary evidence and directed final adjudication of the case between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court (PCR 01/2021, in Kannada) allowed the petitioner's plea and directed that the case against the respondent be decided on merits. The petitioner alleged a business dispute with the respondent involving a bounced cheque (No. 501431) issued in 2018, subsequent non-recovery attempts, and claims of cheque fraud and misrepresentation. After recording witness testimony on 23.03.2022 and 18.06.2022, the court admitted the documentary evidence and directed final adjudication of the case between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts