Chandrashekar s/o Mahesh, 14 yrs, R/o Udgi now at Venkatesh Nagar, Sedam, through next friend, vs Mahesh s/o Shivaputrappa, 52 yrs, R/o Udagi, Tq. Sedam. — 147/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710026402024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
148/2024
Filing Date
09-12-2024
Registration No
147/2024
Registration Date
09-12-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrashekar s/o Mahesh, 14 yrs, R/o Udgi now at Venkatesh Nagar, Sedam, through next friend,
Adv. VIJAYKUMAR MISKIN
Kaveri d/o Mahesh, 13 yrs, R/o Udgi now at Venkatesh Nagar, Sedam, U/g of her mother,
Respondent(s)
Mahesh s/o Shivaputrappa, 52 yrs, R/o Udagi, Tq. Sedam.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
ORDERS
ORDERS
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 19-01-2026 | ORDERS |
| 14-01-2026 | ORDERS |
| 18-12-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 147/2024 On 13-03-2026, the court examined PW-1 (first petitioner's witness) who submitted an affidavit. The petitioner's counsel (Adv. SKR) confirmed all statements in the affidavit were true and accurate. Seven computer documents (Exh. NIP-1 to 7), three mutation registers (Exh. NIP-8 to 10), a gram panchayat demand register extract (Exh. NIP-11), and an e-account extract (Exh. NIP-12) were marked as evidence. The main examination concluded, and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was adjourned to a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 147/2024 On 13-03-2026, the court examined PW-1 (first petitioner's witness) who submitted an affidavit. The petitioner's counsel (Adv. SKR) confirmed all statements in the affidavit were true and accurate. Seven computer documents (Exh. NIP-1 to 7), three mutation registers (Exh. NIP-8 to 10), a gram panchayat demand register extract (Exh. NIP-11), and an e-account extract (Exh. NIP-12) were marked as evidence. The main examination concluded, and cross-examination by the respondent's counsel was adjourned to a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts