Shivanandamma d/o Basawaraj w/o Ramlu Boddu, 39 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam. vs Sharanamma w/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 64 yrs, R/o Sindhanamadu, Tq. Sedam. — 127/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 04th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710024062024
Filing Number
128/2024
Filing Date
26-10-2024
Registration No
127/2024
Registration Date
26-10-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivanandamma d/o Basawaraj w/o Ramlu Boddu, 39 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam.
Adv. SURENDRA.K.DESHPANDE
Chandrakala d/o Basawaraj w/o Chandrashekhar Walikar, 35 yrs, R/o Jawahar Nagar,
Saraswati d/o Basawaraj w/o Hanamantu Manigeri, 37 yrs, R/o Kakalwar, Tq. Gurumitkal,
Chennabasamma d/o Baswaraj w/o Rajkumar, 32 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu
Jayashree d/o Basawaraj w/o Hanamntu Bevingida, 30 yrs, R/o Bankalaga, Tq. Chittapur
Rukimini d/o Basawaraj w/o Hanamanth Manigeri, died by Lrs.(Legal Heir) 6.
Hanamanth s/o buggappa Manigeri, 44 yrs, R/o Kakalwar, Tq. Gurumitkal 6.
Praveenkumar s/o Hanamnth Manigeri, 17 yrs, R/o Kalawar, Tq. Gurumitkal 6.
Prabhakar s/o Hanmanth Manigeri, 14 yrs, R/o Kalawar, Tq. Gurumitkal
Respondent(s)
Sharanamma w/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 64 yrs, R/o Sindhanamadu, Tq. Sedam.
Shravankumar s/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 33 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam.
Mounesh s/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 26 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S. No. 127/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge at Sedam decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the disputed properties are ancestral joint family assets and ordered partition with separate possession. Plaintiffs 1-5, defendants 2-3, and deceased plaintiff 6's heirs (6a-6c) each receive 10/81st share, while defendant 1 (widow) receives 1/81st share, with the office to draw the preliminary decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 127/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge at Sedam decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the disputed properties are ancestral joint family assets and ordered partition with separate possession. Plaintiffs 1-5, defendants 2-3, and deceased plaintiff 6's heirs (6a-6c) each receive 10/81st share, while defendant 1 (widow) receives 1/81st share, with the office to draw the preliminary decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts