Shivanandamma d/o Basawaraj w/o Ramlu Boddu, 39 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam. vs Sharanamma w/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 64 yrs, R/o Sindhanamadu, Tq. Sedam. — 127/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 04th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710024062024
Filing Number
128/2024
Filing Date
26-Oct-2024
Registration No
127/2024
Registration Date
26-Oct-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivanandamma d/o Basawaraj w/o Ramlu Boddu, 39 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam.
Adv. SURENDRA.K.DESHPANDE
-
2.Chandrakala d/o Basawaraj w/o Chandrashekhar Walikar, 35 yrs, R/o Jawahar Nagar,
-
3.Saraswati d/o Basawaraj w/o Hanamantu Manigeri, 37 yrs, R/o Kakalwar, Tq. Gurumitkal,
-
4.Chennabasamma d/o Baswaraj w/o Rajkumar, 32 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu
-
5.Jayashree d/o Basawaraj w/o Hanamntu Bevingida, 30 yrs, R/o Bankalaga, Tq. Chittapur
-
6.Rukimini d/o Basawaraj w/o Hanamanth Manigeri, died by Lrs.(Legal Heir) 6.
-
7.Hanamanth s/o buggappa Manigeri, 44 yrs, R/o Kakalwar, Tq. Gurumitkal 6.
-
8.Praveenkumar s/o Hanamnth Manigeri, 17 yrs, R/o Kalawar, Tq. Gurumitkal 6.
-
9.Prabhakar s/o Hanmanth Manigeri, 14 yrs, R/o Kalawar, Tq. Gurumitkal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sharanamma w/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 64 yrs, R/o Sindhanamadu, Tq. Sedam.
-
2.Shravankumar s/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 33 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam.
-
3.Mounesh s/o Basawaraj Kotarki, 26 yrs, R/o Sindhanmadu, Tq. Sedam.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 127/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge at Sedam decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the disputed properties are ancestral joint family assets and ordered partition with separate possession. Plaintiffs 1-5, defendants 2-3, and deceased plaintiff 6's heirs (6a-6c) each receive 10/81st share, while defendant 1 (widow) receives 1/81st share, with the office to draw the preliminary decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
28-Mar-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
04-Mar-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
20-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
14-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
08-Jan-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
04-Dec-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
26-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2024
Case Summary: O.S. No. 127/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge at Sedam decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the disputed properties are ancestral joint family assets and ordered partition with separate possession. Plaintiffs 1-5, defendants 2-3, and deceased plaintiff 6's heirs (6a-6c) each receive 10/81st share, while defendant 1 (widow) receives 1/81st share, with the office to draw the preliminary decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts