Salma Begum d/o Late Mirza Sardarali Baig w/o Chandpash, 54 yrs, R/o Ibrahimpur, Tandgadgi. vs Firoz Ali Baig s/o Mirza Sardar Ali Baig, 46 yrs, R/o Plot No. 35, Sy. No. 20, Agadpur road, Kalabu — 112/2024

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: Evidence-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence-CIVIL Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB710023382024

Filing Number

113/2024

Filing Date

02-Sep-2024

Registration No

112/2024

Registration Date

02-Sep-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Salma Begum d/o Late Mirza Sardarali Baig w/o Chandpash, 54 yrs, R/o Ibrahimpur, Tandgadgi.

    Adv. SRI.SHIVARAJ APPAJI.

  2. 2.Shaikh Thahseem d/o Late Mirza Sardar Ali Baig, 44 yrs, R/o Saroornagar, Rangareddy

  3. 3.Freen Begum d/o Late Mirza Saradar Ali Baig, w/o Mohamad Arif, 40 yrs, R/o Shahapur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Firoz Ali Baig s/o Mirza Sardar Ali Baig, 46 yrs, R/o Plot No. 35, Sy. No. 20, Agadpur road, Kalabu

  2. 2.Yasmeen Begum d/o Mirza Sardar Ali Baig, 38 yrs, R/o Plot No. 35 Sy. No. 20 Agadpur, Kalaburagi

  3. 3.Jaffer Ali Baig s/o Mirza Sardar Ali Baig, 33 yrs, R/o R/o Malkhed, Tq. Sedam.

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  3. 02-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    In OS No. 112/2024, the court examined PW-1 (witness) on 02-03-2026, who submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of all statements made therein. The court admitted nine computer printouts as exhibits (marked as NI-1 to NI-9), a copy of the witness's affidavit (NI-10), and a family tree (NI-11). The main hearing proceeded with the plaintiff's counsel, and the case was adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant's witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    IssueView PDF

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    IssueView PDF

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  17. 28-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  18. 19-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  19. 16-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  20. 09-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  21. 26-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  22. 20-Feb-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  23. 10-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  24. 02-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  25. 14-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  26. 02-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 02-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In OS No. 112/2024, the court examined PW-1 (witness) on 02-03-2026, who submitted an affidavit affirming the truthfulness of all statements made therein. The court admitted nine computer printouts as exhibits (marked as NI-1 to NI-9), a copy of the witness's affidavit (NI-10), and a family tree (NI-11). The main hearing proceeded with the plaintiff's counsel, and the case was adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant's witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case