Vasantkumar s/o Ambarao Patil, 35 yrs, R/o Sedam. vs Chandramma w/o Siddramappa, 57 yrs, R/o Kodla, Tq. sedam. — 108/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710023292024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
109/2024
Filing Date
28-08-2024
Registration No
108/2024
Registration Date
28-08-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vasantkumar s/o Ambarao Patil, 35 yrs, R/o Sedam.
Adv. RAJENDRA R MUNNUR
Respondent(s)
Chandramma w/o Siddramappa, 57 yrs, R/o Kodla, Tq. sedam.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 10-10-2025 | A.D.R. |
| 28-08-2025 | A.D.R. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted an ex parte temporary injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property until the next hearing date (01.10.2024). The plaintiff established a prima facie case for specific performance of a property sale contract where the defendant received Rs. 16,76,000 of Rs. 17,76,000 consideration but refused to execute the sale deed. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit process fee within three days, failing which the order stands automatically vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted an ex parte temporary injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property until the next hearing date (01.10.2024). The plaintiff established a prima facie case for specific performance of a property sale contract where the defendant received Rs. 16,76,000 of Rs. 17,76,000 consideration but refused to execute the sale deed. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit process fee within three days, failing which the order stands automatically vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts