Waheda Fatima w/o Syed Munawar Ali, 45 yrs, R/o house of Gulam Mohammed, H. No. 5-467, Noor Bagh, vs Mirza Muzaffar Baig s/o Mirza AnwarBaig, 42 yrs, R/o H. No. 8-1-40, Block -B, Samata Toli Chowki — 18/2024
Case under Under Order 21 Rule 11 Section 18. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAKB710017342024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
18/2024
Filing Date
28-05-2024
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
28-05-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Waheda Fatima w/o Syed Munawar Ali, 45 yrs, R/o house of Gulam Mohammed, H. No. 5-467, Noor Bagh,
Adv. RUDRAWAR NARAYANREDDY
Rahat Mateen w/o Meer Afzal Alikhan, 37 yrs, R/o 23-6-33, Hari bowli Shalibanda, Hyderbad.
Farhat Yasmeen w/o Khadeer Ahmad Khan, 55 yrs, R/o 23-6-33, Hari bowli, Shalibanda, Hyderabad.
Respondent(s)
Mirza Muzaffar Baig s/o Mirza AnwarBaig, 42 yrs, R/o H. No. 8-1-40, Block -B, Samata Toli Chowki
Mirza Mudassir Baig s/o Mirza Anwar Baig, 41 yrs, R/o Maharaj hotel, Near petrol bunk, Sedam.
Azmat Mubeen d/o Mirza Anwar Baig, 35 yrs, R/o H. No. 2-6-77, Cnoti base, Sedam.
Fatima Musrat Tabassum w/o Late Mubassir Baig, 45 yrs, R/o H. No. 2-6-77, Choti base, Sedam.
Mirza Sohail Baig s/o Late Mubbasir Baig, 21 yrs, R/o H. No. 2-6-77, Choti base, Sedam.
Mirza Anwar Baig s/o Late Mubassir Baig, 19 yrs, R/o H. No. 2-6-77, choti Base, Sedam.
Mirza Akram Baig s/o Late Mubbassir Baig, 16 yrs, R/o H. No. 2-6-77, Choti base, Sedam.
Wajid Farima w/o Syed Azimoddin Hussaini, 50 yrs, R/o House of Gulam Mohammed, H. No. 5-467, Noor
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 28-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 27-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by decree holder No.1 under Order 21 Rule 97 of CPC seeking to remove obstructions caused by judgment debtors in executing a compromise decree in OS No.77/2018 (partition and possession case) has been dismissed. The court found that judgment debtors were not actually obstructing decree execution; instead, they had completed developmental work and were cooperating by seeking issuance of delivery warrants to hand over possession of allotted plots to decree holders as per the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by decree holder No.1 under Order 21 Rule 97 of CPC seeking to remove obstructions caused by judgment debtors in executing a compromise decree in OS No.77/2018 (partition and possession case) has been dismissed. The court found that judgment debtors were not actually obstructing decree execution; instead, they had completed developmental work and were cooperating by seeking issuance of delivery warrants to hand over possession of allotted plots to decree holders as per the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts