Shravanakumar @ Sharan Kumar s/o Muttappa Sandimani, 19 yrs, R/o Sumbad, Tq. Yadrami, now Kurkunta vs Adiveppa s/o Prakash, 33 yrs, R/o Bhusnoor, Tq. Aland. — 571/2024
Case under 166 Imv Act Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB710017272024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
339/2024
Filing Date
13-03-2024
Registration No
571/2024
Registration Date
16-05-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shravanakumar @ Sharan Kumar s/o Muttappa Sandimani, 19 yrs, R/o Sumbad, Tq. Yadrami, now Kurkunta
Respondent(s)
Adiveppa s/o Prakash, 33 yrs, R/o Bhusnoor, Tq. Aland.
The Manager, United India Ins. Co. Ltd., II floor, Century complex, Super Market, Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 30-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 28-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 23-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Interim Orders
Case 571/2024 Summary: The court allowed petitioner's amendment application under CPC Rule 17, correcting the vehicle description from Honda Dio Car (Regn.No.KA.32/ET.5293) to Honda Dio Motorcycle (Regn.No.KA.25/ET.5293). The charge sheet confirmed the FIR contained a typographical error due to complainant's misconception. The court found no prejudice to respondents and permitted amendment in both MVC cases 66/2024 and 571/2024. Case adjourned to 23.04.2025 for amended petition and respondent's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 571/2024 Summary: The court allowed petitioner's amendment application under CPC Rule 17, correcting the vehicle description from Honda Dio Car (Regn.No.KA.32/ET.5293) to Honda Dio Motorcycle (Regn.No.KA.25/ET.5293). The charge sheet confirmed the FIR contained a typographical error due to complainant's misconception. The court found no prejudice to respondents and permitted amendment in both MVC cases 66/2024 and 571/2024. Case adjourned to 23.04.2025 for amended petition and respondent's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts