Champa Bai W/o Babu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sed vs Pandu S/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod AGe 60 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabur — 50/2024

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 28th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB710017062024

Case disposed

Filing Number

52/2024

Filing Date

26-04-2024

Registration No

50/2024

Registration Date

26-04-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7

Petitioner(s)

Champa Bai W/o Babu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sed

Adv. SRI. H.S. CHAVAN

Kesi Bai alias Shashikala W/o Kesu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 40 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venka

Respondent(s)

Pandu S/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod AGe 60 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabur

Kishan Rathod died, throgh his LRs i.e. wife Dharmibai W/o Late Kishan Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/

Khemsing S/o Late Bhikku Rathod AGe 50 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabura

Seetaram S/o Late Bhikku sing Rathod Age 50 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kal

Assistant Commissioner Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi

Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industial Area Development Board, Humnabad Road, Industr

Manager Vasudatta Cement Company Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi

Tahsildar, Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi

Hearing History

Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

28-04-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

25-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

15-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

09-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: O.S. No. 50/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the suit property (1 acre 11 guntas in Survey No. 651) is ancestral joint family property. The plaintiffs and defendants 1-4 are each entitled to an equal 1/6th share in the property by partition and separate possession, with defendant 2 (widow of deceased defendant) also entitled to 1/6th share of her late husband's portion. Key Reasoning: The court found that land measuring 17 acres 8 guntas was lawfully acquired for industrial purposes, leaving 1 acre 11 guntas unacquired. An Assistant Commissioner's 2023 order confirmed this remainder belonged to the original owner. The suit was not barred by limitation as partition under Hindu law is a recurring right until effected. The defendant witness's credibility was discredited for refusing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-09-2024
Orders
15-10-2024
Orders
15-10-2024
Issue
20-03-2025
Deposition
14-08-2025
Deposition
22-08-2025
Deposition
14-11-2025
Deposition
11-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 50/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the suit property (1 acre 11 guntas in Survey No. 651) is ancestral joint family property. The plaintiffs and defendants 1-4 are each entitled to an equal 1/6th share in the property by partition and separate possession, with defendant 2 (widow of deceased defendant) also entitled to 1/6th share of her late husband's portion. Key Reasoning: The court found that land measuring 17 acres 8 guntas was lawfully acquired for industrial purposes, leaving 1 acre 11 guntas unacquired. An Assistant Commissioner's 2023 order confirmed this remainder belonged to the original owner. The suit was not barred by limitation as partition under Hindu law is a recurring right until effected. The defendant witness's credibility was discredited for refusing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case