Champa Bai W/o Babu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sed vs Pandu S/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod AGe 60 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabur — 50/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 28th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710017062024
Filing Number
52/2024
Filing Date
26-04-2024
Registration No
50/2024
Registration Date
26-04-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Champa Bai W/o Babu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sed
Adv. SRI. H.S. CHAVAN
Kesi Bai alias Shashikala W/o Kesu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 40 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venka
Respondent(s)
Pandu S/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod AGe 60 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabur
Kishan Rathod died, throgh his LRs i.e. wife Dharmibai W/o Late Kishan Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/
Khemsing S/o Late Bhikku Rathod AGe 50 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabura
Seetaram S/o Late Bhikku sing Rathod Age 50 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kal
Assistant Commissioner Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi
Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industial Area Development Board, Humnabad Road, Industr
Manager Vasudatta Cement Company Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi
Tahsildar, Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Disposed
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 25-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 09-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S. No. 50/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the suit property (1 acre 11 guntas in Survey No. 651) is ancestral joint family property. The plaintiffs and defendants 1-4 are each entitled to an equal 1/6th share in the property by partition and separate possession, with defendant 2 (widow of deceased defendant) also entitled to 1/6th share of her late husband's portion. Key Reasoning: The court found that land measuring 17 acres 8 guntas was lawfully acquired for industrial purposes, leaving 1 acre 11 guntas unacquired. An Assistant Commissioner's 2023 order confirmed this remainder belonged to the original owner. The suit was not barred by limitation as partition under Hindu law is a recurring right until effected. The defendant witness's credibility was discredited for refusing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 50/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the suit property (1 acre 11 guntas in Survey No. 651) is ancestral joint family property. The plaintiffs and defendants 1-4 are each entitled to an equal 1/6th share in the property by partition and separate possession, with defendant 2 (widow of deceased defendant) also entitled to 1/6th share of her late husband's portion. Key Reasoning: The court found that land measuring 17 acres 8 guntas was lawfully acquired for industrial purposes, leaving 1 acre 11 guntas unacquired. An Assistant Commissioner's 2023 order confirmed this remainder belonged to the original owner. The suit was not barred by limitation as partition under Hindu law is a recurring right until effected. The defendant witness's credibility was discredited for refusing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts