Champa Bai W/o Babu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sed vs Pandu S/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod AGe 60 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabur — 50/2024

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB710017062024

Filing Number

52/2024

Filing Date

26-Apr-2024

Registration No

50/2024

Registration Date

26-Apr-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Champa Bai W/o Babu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sed

    Adv. SRI. H.S. CHAVAN

  2. 2.Kesi Bai alias Shashikala W/o Kesu Chavan D/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod Age 40 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venka

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pandu S/o Late Bhikku Singh Rathod AGe 60 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabur

  2. 2.Kishan Rathod died, throgh his LRs i.e. wife Dharmibai W/o Late Kishan Rathod Age 55 yrs Occ Agri R/

  3. 3.Khemsing S/o Late Bhikku Rathod AGe 50 yrs Occ Agri R/o Venkatesh Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kalabura

  4. 4.Seetaram S/o Late Bhikku sing Rathod Age 50 yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Sedam Tq Sedam Dist Kal

  5. 5.Assistant Commissioner Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi

  6. 6.Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industial Area Development Board, Humnabad Road, Industr

  7. 7.Manager Vasudatta Cement Company Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi

  8. 8.Tahsildar, Sedam, Tq Sedam Dist Kalaburagi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 50/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the suit property (1 acre 11 guntas in Survey No. 651) is ancestral joint family property. The plaintiffs and defendants 1-4 are each entitled to an equal 1/6th share in the property by partition and separate possession, with defendant 2 (widow of deceased defendant) also entitled to 1/6th share of her late husband's portion. Key Reasoning: The court found that land measuring 17 acres 8 guntas was lawfully acquired for industrial purposes, leaving 1 acre 11 guntas unacquired. An Assistant Commissioner's 2023 order confirmed this remainder belonged to the original owner. The suit was not barred by limitation as partition under Hindu law is a recurring right until effected. The defendant witness's credibility was discredited for refusing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  11. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  13. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  14. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  17. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  20. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  21. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  22. 22-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  24. 14-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  26. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  27. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  28. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  29. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  30. 20-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  31. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  32. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  33. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  34. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  35. 15-Oct-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  36. 15-Oct-2024

    IssueView PDF

  37. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  38. 14-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  39. 26-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  40. 03-Sep-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  41. 03-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  42. 29-Aug-2024

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  43. 21-Aug-2024

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  44. 19-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  45. 08-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  46. 25-Jul-2024

    Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  47. 04-Jul-2024

    Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  48. 12-Jun-2024

    Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  49. 26-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 26-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 50/2024 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs. The court held that the suit property (1 acre 11 guntas in Survey No. 651) is ancestral joint family property. The plaintiffs and defendants 1-4 are each entitled to an equal 1/6th share in the property by partition and separate possession, with defendant 2 (widow of deceased defendant) also entitled to 1/6th share of her late husband's portion. Key Reasoning: The court found that land measuring 17 acres 8 guntas was lawfully acquired for industrial purposes, leaving 1 acre 11 guntas unacquired. An Assistant Commissioner's 2023 order confirmed this remainder belonged to the original owner. The suit was not barred by limitation as partition under Hindu law is a recurring right until effected. The defendant witness's credibility was discredited for refusing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case